Here's a new (proprietary) song lyric that still awaits a musical setting. (If you want to write one, let me know, and maybe we can work something out.) But I wanted to post this without any further delay, to set up a marker. Perhaps this, by the grace of God, will awaken some sinner and snatch him from the fire.
Before you preach on any public issue, you need to do your research.
In this case, at a minimum, you need to know some of the most important key terms and concepts, like:
the significance of cycle threshold in PCR tests
"investigational vaccine"
therapeutic alternatives (Ivermectin, Zinc+Quercetin, et al.) to investigational vaccines
adverse effects
d-dimer blood test
micro-clotting
informed consent > Is it even possible where information is widely suppressed?
You also need to know the most important dramatis personae (whose credibility and contributions, due to the final bullet point above, are better investigated via Rumble.com than traditional big tech platforms, including the crowd-sourced Wikipedia, which is no more trustworthy than the comment section of any tabloid, and is curated with the same bias as Twitter, FB, YT, etc.).
Robert Malone
Michael Yeadon
Peter McCullough
Pierre Kory
Ryan Cole
Vladamir Zelenko
Stella Gwandiku-Ambe Immanuel
Kary Mullis
Even if you do not, in the end, agree with the concerns expressed by these key players, you will at least avoid presumptuous preaching and you will be better informed of the reasons why many people, especially high school dropouts and PhDs, many persons of color, those who are younger and often espouse no religion at all, those with natural immunity, those with compromised immunity, those with religious objections to medical research developed using aborted fetal tissue, etc., express hesitancy to receive what they perceive to be — not without reason — a risky, even dangerous "investigational" vaccine. Certainly, you should not blunder into the pulpit to preach a pro-vaccine sermon based on nothing more than the thoughtless presumption that receiving the vaccine and all the obligatory forthcoming boosters is somehow ethically "the right thing for everyone to do." Preaching and ministry also have a hippocratic obligation. Such a sermon would clearly violate that.
UPDATE: August 27, 2020 — Contrary to widely publicized (mis)information, the Pfizer-BioNTec is not actually approved for non-emergency use. See Sen. Johnson's letter to the FDA about this:
And then there is this from the great Eric Clapton:
And now here is yet another (!) readily available medicine — in addition to HCQ (with zinc, of course), Ivermectin, Pulimicort, etc. — that shows promise under re-purposed, off-label use:
Here is a link to The Nuremberg Code, which researchers involving human subjects in every field — from psychology to pharmaceuticals — need to be familiar with. Give them a look. What do you think? Are these still relevant? I sure hope so.
