Well, not exactly. But I have to say, I like these guys, and evidently they like Tim Tebow. They, and a few others these days, are remembering an all-important distinction, not just for life in general, but, as I preach to my preaching classes, it is all-important for preaching as well: the infinite qualitative difference between irony and earnestness. It's an old point made by Kierkegaard (the so-called master of irony, whose earnest writing has yet to been taken seriously as such) and running through his authorship from beginning to end. More on this if (Lord willing) my sabbatical request is approved.
Curating the biblical and Reformed theological traditions in order "to make the Word of God fully known"
Thursday, December 8, 2011
What? Another football post?
Labels:
bill whittle,
earnestness,
irony,
kierkegaard,
scott ott,
stephen green,
tim tebow,
trifecta
Sunday, December 4, 2011
An old poem you might enjoy
Here's a wee thing that made its way into print almost ten years ago now. Phew! Where does the time go? Anyway, I thought you might enjoy it round about this time of year. It looks better on, you know, paper (remember paper?) than in the herky-jerky format of an on-line cached file, but it still sounds good, if you give it the tone and the tempo of the poetic.
Instead of the idealized view we harbor of Mary, I like the idea that she was tired, but graciously polite and respectful, when receiving the visitors from the east, even if their visit may have seemed a bit intrusive. Is this not the way it is with grace, which theologians such as George Hunsinger and Walter Brueggemann have rightly describe as disruptive?
My favorite lines are these:



UPDATE: The first link is bad, though I'm not sure why. Meanwhile, the poem is included in my new volume, The Just, Quiet Wind.


Instead of the idealized view we harbor of Mary, I like the idea that she was tired, but graciously polite and respectful, when receiving the visitors from the east, even if their visit may have seemed a bit intrusive. Is this not the way it is with grace, which theologians such as George Hunsinger and Walter Brueggemann have rightly describe as disruptive?
My favorite lines are these:
The visitors beam with eyes full of starfirelight
taking the passive child and passing him lightly
with expert elder hands of night
May the Lord bless you this Advent and Christmas with his joyful Spirit of the sacred poetic, and may grace disrupt every moment when you find yourself at risk of slouching into drudgery and despond.
UPDATE: The first link is bad, though I'm not sure why. Meanwhile, the poem is included in my new volume, The Just, Quiet Wind.
Labels:
brueggemann,
disruptive grace,
gifts,
hunsinger,
magi,
mary,
matthew 2:1-12,
theology today,
wise men
Thursday, December 1, 2011
"Groans of the Spirit" garners its first review on Amazon
Who says pastors don't read books anymore? After only a year on its own in the world, my little toddler, Groans of the Spirit, has garnered its first review on Amazon, and from a fine preacher at that. Thanks, Gregg!


Year D's curriculum vitae
Since questions are often asked regarding the sources and origins of lectionaries and the modifications and developments they undergo, let me offer, for the sake of posterity, a historical timeline of this project, with all glory, laud, and honor to the Triune God for inspiring it, of course. (Others have proposed four-year lectionaries before, such as the Joint Liturgical Group, headed by the late Methodist pastor, the Rev. Raymond George. But that one never took off.) In the forthcoming introduction to the print version of Year D, three more recent (yet very different) proposals are acknowledged that became known to me after The Year D Project website was launched. There may be others; but here are a few selected events in the emergence of the present project.
- January 1999 - "The Psalter of the Disappeared," with "A 'Hit' List" and the missing texts from the Gospel of John presented to classmates at Columbia Theological Seminary.
- Fall 2002 - Year D proposed in a Comprehensive (doctoral) Exam on worship at Princeton Theological Seminary. [NB: Didn't flunk.]
- Summer 2004 - Key gospel and epistle texts identified as missing from the RCL.
- Fall 2004 - Gospel, epistle, and psalm texts assigned to specific Sundays of the liturgical year.
- Advent 2004 through Christ the King 2005 - Year D is implemented and preached at the First Presbyterian Church, Titusville, NJ, with Old Testament lections identified and elements written on a weekly basis.
- Summer 2005 - First draft of rationale written on study leave in SC.
- May 8, 2007 - "Year D: A Proposed Supplement to the Revised Common Lectionary,” Presbytery of New Brunswick.
- August 2007 - “Expand the Lectionary! The Need for and Features of Supplementary Year D,” submitted to The Academy of Homiletics: Papers of the Annual Meeting, 42nd Mtg. (2007).
- January 2008 - “Fresh Inspiration for the Resurrection Cycle,” Continuing education event, Princeton Theological Seminary.
- April 2008 - "Year D: A Proposed Supplement to the Revised Common Lectionary,” presented to faculty and students at the University of Dubuque Theological Seminary. [NB: Got the job.]
- February 23, 2010 - “Preaching at Easter, in Eastertide, and Beyond,” at the Presbytery of Great Rivers.
- March 2010 - The Year D Project website launched: http://theyeardproject.blogspot.com
- January 2011 - Year D: A Quadrennial Supplement to the Revised Common Lectionary contracted with Cascade Books.
- August 31, 2011 - Year D final draft ms. submitted to Cascade Books (forthcoming in 2012).
- October 2011 - "To Hear the Voice of Texts Long Silenced, Consider Year D,” in The Presbyterian Outlook, Vol. 193, No. 22 (October 31, 2011).
- November 8, 2011 - "Year D: Scriptural & Nutritional Supplements for the Body of Christ" (A Presbyterian Outlook 90-minute Webinar).
UPDATED:
- February 20, 2012 - "Fit to Burst: Dialectical Reading and Preaching in Lent using Supplementary Texts from Year D," South Dakota Presbytery.
Labels:
four-year lectionary,
joint liturgical group,
methodist,
raymond george,
revised common lectionary,
year d
Posting Dates Correspond to Event Dates
Dear Year D Readers:
For your ease of use, I am in the practice of "bumping" the posting dates for all worship events from week to week so as to make them correspond with the actual upcoming events. Thus, the front or home page of this site will normally be the next upcoming liturgical event, Sunday or feast day. (Other posts are then shuffled in so that the latest appear near the top of the stack.)
In addition to searching the archives by month, you can also search the site using the search box at right, or by way of the RSS button in the URL address bar of your browser.
Blessings and peace in Christ,
TMS
UPDATE (October 5, 2012): You may have noticed the system of dating described above no longer applies, since Google/Blogger has eliminated the possibility of posting things ahead of time. One can schedule their appearance at a specific time, but one cannot show the actual publication date of a post ahead of the actual tick of the clock in real time. Darn. As a result of this change, I'm now trying to post the next coming event with a few days lead time (i.e., bump it up to the top of the stack) so that it will be most useful and you won't have to search deep in the archives. But the date as such will not be the forthcoming Sunday. Sorry about that.
For your ease of use, I am in the practice of "bumping" the posting dates for all worship events from week to week so as to make them correspond with the actual upcoming events. Thus, the front or home page of this site will normally be the next upcoming liturgical event, Sunday or feast day. (Other posts are then shuffled in so that the latest appear near the top of the stack.)
In addition to searching the archives by month, you can also search the site using the search box at right, or by way of the RSS button in the URL address bar of your browser.
Blessings and peace in Christ,
TMS
UPDATE (October 5, 2012): You may have noticed the system of dating described above no longer applies, since Google/Blogger has eliminated the possibility of posting things ahead of time. One can schedule their appearance at a specific time, but one cannot show the actual publication date of a post ahead of the actual tick of the clock in real time. Darn. As a result of this change, I'm now trying to post the next coming event with a few days lead time (i.e., bump it up to the top of the stack) so that it will be most useful and you won't have to search deep in the archives. But the date as such will not be the forthcoming Sunday. Sorry about that.
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Meet the new Director of Theology, Worship, and Education
As a colleague of Chip Hardwick from our days in the doctoral program at Princeton Seminary, I take this as decidely good news.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
I don't do a lot of football posts, but this is pretty cool ...
This story is a month old now, but the hearts of many Iowans, Dubuquers, and University of Dubuque students, parents, alums, faculty, staff, trustees, etc., ... are still bursting with pride at this young man's accomplishments. Please note the phrase: "all divisions." Besides breaking this twelve-year-old record, Michael Zweifel is also a 2011 recipient of one of sixteen National Football Foundation (NFF) & College Hall of Fame's National Scholar-Athlete Awards, with a 3.9 GPA. Congratulations, Michael!
Labels:
all-time,
michael zweifel,
ncaa,
pass receptions,
record,
university of dubuque
Thursday, November 24, 2011
Solway's essay on "The Death of the Individual"
David Solway's latest post is well worth reading in its entirety, and not just for this memorable line:
"when it comes to the cynics, there’s no cure like a sinecure."
I confess, as I read this article sympathetically my impatience was nevertheless such that I had to scroll down to see when and if he would refer to Kierkegaard, and sure enough, found the reference I was anticipating at the very end, a veritable coup de grace.
I could not help but notice, however, that for Solway, Kierkegaard remains a "Danish philosopher." The question I have for Solway and for his readers, as well as readers of Hayek (whom he quotes with approval) is this: Why must the positive view of the individual expressed here continually drive those concerned for individual freedom and potential to the atheist Ayn Rand, or to Kierkegaard as individualistic philosopher (an unjust caricature if there ever was one), rather than to Kierkegaard the exegete of Christian scripture, the author of Christian Discourses, whose "philosophy" was tested and inspired by the New Testament at every point? For it sure seems to me that if a properly formed response to the barbarian collectivism of the left is to be offered, conservatism will have to do better than a merely secular individualism. Perhaps the coming bicentennial (2013) may yet afford an honest reappraisal of Kierkegaard's vocation and inspiration, but I am not optimistic, no more so than when a great thinker who calls for a radical return to founding principles can see no further than The Federalist Papers, or at most the rise of the individual in the West, i.e., when such a thinker fails to hear the Word Incarnate assuring him that the heavenly Father has accounted for every hair on his individual head.
This critical question aside, let there be no doubt that there are few writers working today as insightful and articulate as Solway.
"when it comes to the cynics, there’s no cure like a sinecure."
I confess, as I read this article sympathetically my impatience was nevertheless such that I had to scroll down to see when and if he would refer to Kierkegaard, and sure enough, found the reference I was anticipating at the very end, a veritable coup de grace.
I could not help but notice, however, that for Solway, Kierkegaard remains a "Danish philosopher." The question I have for Solway and for his readers, as well as readers of Hayek (whom he quotes with approval) is this: Why must the positive view of the individual expressed here continually drive those concerned for individual freedom and potential to the atheist Ayn Rand, or to Kierkegaard as individualistic philosopher (an unjust caricature if there ever was one), rather than to Kierkegaard the exegete of Christian scripture, the author of Christian Discourses, whose "philosophy" was tested and inspired by the New Testament at every point? For it sure seems to me that if a properly formed response to the barbarian collectivism of the left is to be offered, conservatism will have to do better than a merely secular individualism. Perhaps the coming bicentennial (2013) may yet afford an honest reappraisal of Kierkegaard's vocation and inspiration, but I am not optimistic, no more so than when a great thinker who calls for a radical return to founding principles can see no further than The Federalist Papers, or at most the rise of the individual in the West, i.e., when such a thinker fails to hear the Word Incarnate assuring him that the heavenly Father has accounted for every hair on his individual head.
This critical question aside, let there be no doubt that there are few writers working today as insightful and articulate as Solway.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)